Skip to main content

Open source CMS evaluations

I have now seen three more or less serious open source CMS reviews.

First guy to hit the field was Matt Raible (1 2 3 4), ending up with Drupal, Joomla, Magnolia, OpenCms and MeshCMS being runner-ups.

Then there is
OpenAdvantage that tries out a handful (Drupal, Exponent CMS, Lenya, Mambo, and Silva), including Plone which they use for their own site (funny/annoying that the entire site has no RSS-feeds, nor is it possible to comment on the articles), following Matt's approach by exluding many CMS that seem not to fit the criteria. It is somewhat strange that OpenAdvantage cuts away Magnolia because it "Requires J2EE server; difficult to install and configure; more of a framework than CMS", and proceed to include Apache Lenya in the full evaluation. Magnolia does not require a J2EE server. It runs on Tomcat just like Lenya does (maybe it's an idea to bundle Magnolia with Jetty to make it seem more lightweight). I'm still sure that OpenAdvantage would 'fail' Magnolia for being too complicated as Matt did.

All websites have a different need, and these two evaluators value ease of setup, use and design-modification (not functional modification). A more enterprise-ish review has been done by Optaros, evaluating for different website needs (brochure, periodical, collaboration, wiki and community). Elegant observation:

Open source content management software is most frequently used in small to medium sized web sites with very common requirements (such as corporate identity websites and departmental intranet sites or online magazines rather than large product websites with hundreds of thousands of pages) and as a foundation for building unique, highly-customized solutions (such as Amazon.com which uses open source components such as Perl, MySQL, and the Mason templating engine).
The paper provides an in-depth evaluation of three or four CMS'es in each of the five categories. I am left with the feeling that the landscape of Java-CMS'es are very far behind the other ones, but still I would prefer to work with a Java-based CMS as it is my language of choice, and because I've fallen pretty much in love the the Java Content Repository. Nonetheless, the paper is an excellent starting point for a small or medium-sized business considering an open source CMS. I wonder if there is a common content repository interface (not Java-dependant). Jackrabbit has (or are on their way to) implemented a PHP-interface for their repository (but still no .net, perl, ruby and python interfaces). In the mean time the closest you get to platform independant content is a database (which is not so good).


Comments

  1. Anonymous30/1/06 06:36

    the observations in your post about Magnolia are true to some extent. However, its strong point is that it supports JSR 170.
    Have you looked at ALfresco and OpenCMS yet?

    check this url for some of my comments on open source products - http://www.apoorv.info/index.php/category/open-source/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the comment! I've already been subscribing to your blog for 3 weeks, mind :)

    From what I've read about Alfresco it does not really constitute a web CMS. It's more of the file-system kind, or DAM system.

    I would be biased towards Magnolia since we have been working with it for half a year, we did a review of different CMS back then. OpenCms is still a very valid option for us, but unfortunately they use activeX components for their WYSIWYG. Can't be the biggest job in the world to fix, but until then I'm staying clear.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous30/1/06 11:50

    You are right about Alfresco. It's more of document management. On top of it, it's still in version 1.

    About OpenCMS, i didn't know about the activex bit. But we've recently used it for a project and it works with firefox as well as IE. Also, in case if it is helpful, they've recently integrated FCKEditor [1]. I have no clue how good or bad it is though.

    Oh and btw, i don't work with Alkacon ;-) It's just that i've played around with opencms recently.

    I've also heard good things also about magnolia. Apart from the initial setup and stuff like that, i think it's a decent product. All the best with your evaluation.

    [1] http://www.opencms.org/opencms/en/download/modules/index.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. FCKEditor should do the trick. In fact it is the same default editor that is used with Magnolia :)

    It is also possible to plug other editors into Magnolia, Kupu for instance.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous27/7/06 01:20

    Hello Thom. Just came across your comments on our CMS article. Just to clarify my reasoning behind the Magnolia/Lenya split, I favoured Lenya (at the time) purely because of the Apache backing. There wasn't much to choose between them (as far as I remember), but I felt that endorsement as an Apache project gave some weight to Lenya. As far as I can tell, Lenya has slipped from the limelight somewhat, and there's a good chance Magnolia is now a better choice, as it seems to have a more active community.

    I still stand by my other decisions, and would personally favour Plone, Joomla! and Drupal as excellent solutions. I fear that Java-based solutions, while excellent and scalable, are still too heavyweight for most of the situations my clients find themselves in. When a more heavyweight solution is required, I feel Plone to be an excellent fit.

    The point you made about our website lacking comment facilities is a good one, and I'll have a word with our director to see whether it's possible for us to switch these on. Your point about RSS is well-taken too.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for your comment, Elliot. It is very hard to say one particular CMS is better than another. As you say, we have to rely on our customers' needs, and choose accordingly.

    Lenya seems to be quite active still, but I'm not sure I would trust the quality of software merely because its Apache top level project status. I just spent some minutes playing around with their demo. It looks nice, but I don't find the UI that intuitive to use, and there are a lot of unstable features (editing, searching, publishing).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Git Stash Blooper (Could not restore untracked files from stash)

The other day I accidentally did a git stash -a , which means it stashes *everything*, including ignored output files (target, build, classes, etc). Ooooops.. What I meant to do was git stash -u , meaning stash modifications plus untracked new files. Anyhows, I ended up with a big fat stash I couldn't get back out. Each time I tried, I got something like this: .../target/temp/dozer.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/core.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/joda-time.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/foo.war already exists, no checkout Could not restore untracked files from stash No matter how I tried checking out different revisions (like the one where I actually made the stash), or using --force, I got the same error. Now these were one of those "keep cool for a second, there's a git way to fix this"situation. I figured: A stash is basically a commit. If we look at my recent commits using   git log --graph --

Leaving eyeo

Thirteen blog posts later, this one notes my departure from eyeo after 4 years and 3 months. I joined eyeo around the headcount of 80 employees, and now I think there's just over 250 people there. My role coming in was as operations manager, doing a mix of infrastructure engineering and technical project management. I later on took on organizational development to help the company deal with its growing pains . We introduced cross-functional teams, departments (kind of like guilds), new leadership structures, goal-setting frameworks, onboarding processes and career frameworks.  And all of this in a rapidly growing distributed company. I'm proud and happy that for a long time I knew every employee by name and got to meet every single new-hire through training them on company structure and processes.  At some point, we had enough experienced leaders and organizational developers that I could zoom back in on working in one team, consulting them on  Git and continuous integration

Managing dot-files with vcsh and myrepos

Say I want to get my dot-files out on a new computer. Here's what I do: # install vcsh & myrepos via apt/brew/etc vcsh clone https://github.com/tfnico/config-mr.git mr mr update Done! All dot-files are ready to use and in place. No deploy command, no linking up symlinks to the files . No checking/out in my entire home directory as a Git repository. Yet, all my dot-files are neatly kept in fine-grained repositories, and any changes I make are immediately ready to be committed: config-atom.git     -> ~/.atom/* config-mr.git     -> ~/.mrconfig     -> ~/.config/mr/* config-tmuxinator.git       -> ~/.tmuxinator/* config-vim.git     -> ~/.vimrc     -> ~/.vim/* config-bin.git        -> ~/bin/* config-git.git               -> ~/.gitconfig config-tmux.git       -> ~/.tmux.conf     config-zsh.git     -> ~/.zshrc How can this be? The key here is to use vcsh to keep track of your dot-files, and its partner myrepos/mr for o

Considerations for JavaScript in Modern (2013) Java/Maven Projects

Disclaimer: I'm a Java developer, not a JavaScript developer. This is just what I've picked up the last years plus a little research the last days. It's just a snapshot of my current knowledge and opinions on the day of writing, apt to change over the next weeks/months. We've gone all modern in our web applications, doing MVC on the client side with AngularJS or Ember , building single-page webapps with REST backends. But how are we managing the growing amount of JavaScript in our application? Yeoman 's logo (not necessarily the conclusion of this blog post) You ain't in Kansas anymore So far we've just been doing half-random stuff. We download some version of a library and throw it into our src/main/webapp/js/lib , or we use it from a CDN , which may be down or unreachable when we want to use the application.. Some times the JS is minified, other times it's not. Some times we name the file with version number, other times without. Some