Skip to main content

How to Kick Off some knowledge meetings

I've gotten some questions about Knowledge Meetings after I presented them as one of our agile practices at FrOSCon some weeks ago. Here are some more ideas/thoughts on how to do them:

What are they?
One hour every week. Gather the whole team together, and learn something.

What should we learn about?
Anything that will be of interest to your team, work-related. Some examples:
  • This new open source library/project/technology we (can) use
  • New programming language
  • This cool testing technique
  • A certain module of the business application
  • The hardware architecture of our data-centers
  • Some applied computer science (algorithms and stuff)
What is the concrete contents of a Knowledge Meeting?
Anything that'll make you learn. Examples:
  • 10 minute lightning talks/ignites
  • Coding Katas, or Randoris
  • Longer presentations (try to not go over 30 minutes)
  • Lots of discussions!
  • Lots of live coding!
Remember:
  • Let people present the things they already know, but..
  • Give people time to prepare their presentations (1 hour per 10 minutes of presentation, as a rule-of-thumb, perhaps?)
How do I get started?
You need support from up top. You simply can't yank people one hour out of their working time every week.

If you don't get support from up top, you're gonna have to do it on a volunteer basis. I've written some strategy for this in my post about workshops. Over time, management will hopefully see value of the knowledge meetings, and start sponsoring them before people start leaving for companies that invest in people's knowledge.

Some tips

  • Give people plenty of time up front to prepare their presentation (one month)
  • Always have the knowledge meeting the same time, week after week
  • Point out a person to make sure the meetings go smoothly (prepare agenda).
  • Over time, let this "knowledge facilitator" role rotate.
  • If it gets hard using the internal knowledge to keep the meetings busy, increase budget: either give people more time to research/preparations, send them to conferences/courses, or hire in some externals to do the occasional gig with presentation.
  • If the knowledge meeting starts losing time to other activities, like retrospectives, try to get a new time appointed to it.
  • If you run out of content and discussion, cut the meeting short
So, I scribbled this together rather quickly, so let me know if I left something out, or if you've got any questions.

Comments

  1. Nice post, thank you :) Two further questions:

    1. You said there should be live coding, does that mean that everyone should sit in front of a PC? We don't have laptops so we couldn't go to the meeting room, and I've learned that meetings in a regular office are far less productive than in a meeting room.

    2. I know a few people that are not particularly interested in technology (probably add "anymore") - how to handle them?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for commenting, Felix :)

    1. Hm! I have mixed feelings about this one. I'd say: for workshops, everyone can have a PC (you could perhaps make these LAN-party style). For live-coding in knowledge meetings, it should be one PC on projector. Perhaps your office can dedicate one PC to be a live-coding station?

    2. Fire them! I mean, it's their job to be interested in technology, right? Seriously though, if someone has no interest in the meeting, they can skip it. It's far more dangerous if people skip the meeting because they don't get time, are too stressed, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cool, thanks. I think you're a bit hard about 2, don't you have 50something co-workers? But it's a good idea to give them the chance to skip the meeting if they are really not interested.

    I think I was a bit harsh too: Everyone is probably at least remotely interested, I just meant that some just don't do non-work-related programming and are content with knowing a few languages sufficiently to get the job done.

    Sadly, not every IT company consists only of geeks, I would really love that :) I fear they are becoming a minority...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Aha, now I read you. I'm talking about knowledge meetings in our own little Java team (18 people). The other departments, like management, QA, non-Java developers, they don't participate (with the occasional exception). So by definition, all participants are Java programmers. This allows us to really nail down the context for the meetings.

    If the team doesn't have a problem with it (some get nervous presenting for bigger crowds), you should of course open up/invite the other parts of your company.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for these framework of a knowledge meeting. Do you have any experience with a distributed development team? 3 offices over 500km away from each other, think this need tools :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Marquies, thanks for your comment.

    I have little experience with distributed teams, although I was at a shop once where they had heavy integration of tele-presence/video conference equipment. Every knowledge meeting was video-conferenced to their other offices. If you've got the money for it, set up some kick-ass TANDBERG equipment. If not, set up some PC's with webcam, running Skype or Oovoo at every meeting.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Thomas: No you got me right the first time, I didn't mean 50 devs, I meant 50 year old devs :) The team is not that big.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't think 50 year olds should get any special treatment :)

    I think the key is to make it clear that participation is about contribution. The wise elders of the organization can contribute a lot! Not only in presenting/producing knowledge, but also commenting on youngsters' contributions.

    If they feel they don't need to participate because they are knowledge-full, then they've misunderstood the contribution part.

    If they are too busy to contribute, you've got bigger (management/organizational) problems.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I found someone who was interested in the idea and together we introduced knowledge meetings in my team. Here's how we do it:

    - We do them every two weeks. There's not yet enough velocity for a weekly meeting.
    - We did them outside work hours because we didn't dare to ask. Attendance was pretty good anyways (~60%). After a few successful meetings, we moved it in work hours.
    - We made it voluntary. That way, people genuinely not interested in a topic don't have to feel like wasting their time. Makes for a friendly atmosphare, and attendance is still high enough.
    - We have a rather fixed structure: 1 10 min talk, 1 30 min talk and subsequent discussion. Might do some workshops/katas in the future.
    - There are few (if any) suggestions, so I just approach people and ask them if they want to talk about a topic. Today will be the first meeting where I'm not giving one, that's a big success :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Open source CMS evaluations

I have now seen three more or less serious open source CMS reviews. First guy to hit the field was Matt Raible ( 1 2 3 4 ), ending up with Drupal , Joomla , Magnolia , OpenCms and MeshCMS being runner-ups. Then there is OpenAdvantage that tries out a handful ( Drupal , Exponent CMS , Lenya , Mambo , and Silva ), including Plone which they use for their own site (funny/annoying that the entire site has no RSS-feeds, nor is it possible to comment on the articles), following Matt's approach by exluding many CMS that seem not to fit the criteria. It is somewhat strange that OpenAdvantage cuts away Magnolia because it "Requires J2EE server; difficult to install and configure; more of a framework than CMS", and proceed to include Apache Lenya in the full evaluation. Magnolia does not require a J2EE server. It runs on Tomcat just like Lenya does (maybe it's an idea to bundle Magnolia with Jetty to make it seem more lightweight). I'm still sure that OpenAdvant

What I've Learned After a Month of Podcasting

So, it's been about a month since I launched   GitMinutes , and wow, it's been a fun ride. I have gotten a lot of feedback, and a lot more downloads/listeners than I had expected! Judging the numbers is hard, but a generous estimate is that somewhere around 2000-3000 have listened to the podcast, and about 500-1000 regularly download. Considering that only a percentage of my target audience actively listen to podcasts, these are some pretty good numbers. I've heard that 10% of the general population in the western world regularly listen to podcasts (probably a bit higher percentage among Git users), so I like to think I've reached a big chunk of the Git pros out there. GitMinutes has gathered 110 followers on Twitter, and 63, erm.. circlers on Google+, and it has received 117 +'es! And it's been flattr'ed twice :) Here are some of the things I learned during this last month: Conceptually.. Starting my own sandbox podcast for trying out everythin

Encrypting and Decrypting with Spring

I was recently working with protecting some sensitive data in a typical Java application with a database underneath. We convert the data on its way out of the application using Spring Security Crypto Utilities . It "was decided" that we'd be doing AES with a key-length of 256 , and this just happens to be the kind of encryption Spring crypto does out of the box. Sweet! The big aber is that whatever JRE is running the application has to be patched with Oracle's JCE  in order to do 256 bits. It's a fascinating story , the short version being that U.S. companies are restricted from exporting various encryption algorithms to certain countries, and some countries are restricted from importing them. Once I had patched my JRE with the JCE, I found it fascinating how straight forward it was to encrypt and decrypt using the Spring Encryptors. So just for fun at the weekend, I threw together a little desktop app that will encrypt and decrypt stuff for the given password

The academical approach

Oops, seems I to published this post prematurely by hitting some Blogger keyboard shortcut. I've been sitting for some minutes trying to figure out how to approach the JavaZone talk mentioned in my previous blog-post. Note that I have already submitted an abstract to the comittee, and that I won't publish the abstract here in the blog. Now of course the abstract is pretty detailed on what the talk is going to be about, but I've still got some elbow room on how to "implement" the talk. I will use this blog as a tool to get my aim right on how to present the talk, what examples to include, what the slides should look like, and how to make it most straightforward and understandable for the audience. Now in lack of having done any presentations at a larger conference before, I'm gonna dig into what I learned at the University, which wasn't very much, but they did teach me how to write a research paper, a skill which I will adapt into creating my talk: The one

Git Stash Blooper (Could not restore untracked files from stash)

The other day I accidentally did a git stash -a , which means it stashes *everything*, including ignored output files (target, build, classes, etc). Ooooops.. What I meant to do was git stash -u , meaning stash modifications plus untracked new files. Anyhows, I ended up with a big fat stash I couldn't get back out. Each time I tried, I got something like this: .../target/temp/dozer.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/core.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/joda-time.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/foo.war already exists, no checkout Could not restore untracked files from stash No matter how I tried checking out different revisions (like the one where I actually made the stash), or using --force, I got the same error. Now these were one of those "keep cool for a second, there's a git way to fix this"situation. I figured: A stash is basically a commit. If we look at my recent commits using   git log --graph --