Skip to main content

A Hard Day's Workshop

I want to tell you about how we introduced one of our more recent practices: Workshops.

During one of our retrospectives this spring, it became apparent that some of our colleagues felt that there was room for more learning in our shop. People were sticking a bit too much to their usual tasks and their usual technologies. We're not a consultancy, so it's not really the core of our mission to use the latest and most hyped tools all the time. We still need to stay updated so we make the right architectural choices when considering doing something the old way, or trying out something new.

But we're too busy to learn new stuff!
For a software developer, the responsibility for your actions is split between what you choose to do, and what you're assigned to do. Of course, you can't run wild and smash all the latest open source tools and languages into the main product line, but at the same time, if you don't take initiative to do a little research on what's going out there, it's very unlikely that you will get any new interesting technologies to work with.

I believe that this research is something we have to spend some of our free-time on.  Many developers will disagree with me here, saying that work stuff is for working hours. Unfortunately, I only get 40 hours of office time a week, and this is not enough for being productive at work plus research. (There are a lot of things I want to keep up with for the sake of an interesting career in technology.)

Pick a card, any card
Now, for the purpose of this post, it's not really important which technology we set out to learn. Anyhow, The Pragmatic Programmer says you should learn a new programming language every year. Personally, I've long wanted to learn Scala, and use it for a pet project, either at work or at home. I see a lot of Norwegian tweeters are experimenting heavily with it, as well as a couple of my colleagues, and they're all boasting endlessly about how great it is to program with.

Seek allies
So, I asked three of my Scala-digging colleagues if they would be interested in us arranging a series of internal workshops for our colleagues, to further our own understanding of Scala (I had none at that point) as well as teach the rest something new. They were in. Being four people taking care to arrange the stuff is a lot more powerful and long-term than driving something like this on your own.

Blessing from above
After we had our new technology ready, and a team of people ready to push it, we went to the boss and explained: This is something we are going to do on our free time, but we want to know to what extent you'll be willing to "sponsor" the event. Obviously, us spending our free time on teaching and learning new stuff is something that will benefit the company, given a relevant technology at least. So we asked:
  1. Can we use the offices? (Usually this is a no-brainer)
  2. Will you buy us pizza? (Amazingly cheap compared to paying overtime, or using working hours)
  3. Can we dip into the regular working hours? (say, we start the workshops one hour before end-of-work-day, once a week)
Interestingly, in these situations you meet a compromise which reflects how much your company is willing to spend on learning, which is an important factor in your choice of place of work. This is something your boss/company should have in mind when they answer questions like this. A little extortion never hurt anyone :)

Implementation
Now, with clearance from above, the four of us got together and planned out the workshops. To minimize preparation work, we borrowed the Scala introduction course from the Norwegian scalaBin organization. We came up with a pet project we could aim to create (an internal problem database, a bit like stackoverflow.com), and pulled out an agenda where we'd do a 2-hour workshop every second Wednesday. We're now done with the 3rd of these workshops, and it's going well. About two thirds of our colleagues are participating, and I think it's safe to say we've learned a lot already, without intruding too much on private time, and not taking too much time away from regular work activities.

Future
I hope that even after we have mastered Scala, we'll continue these workshops for other things, handing over the responsibility to other colleagues who wish to arrange workshops in new fields. From management side, I hope they will see some business benefit in allowing more of these activities, and let it protrude further into working hours.

Summary
It didn't have to be Scala. It could've equally well be any other language, framework or tool. The point is to expand our skill set and knowledge, using our own time and company resources.

Just as you have to fight for your infrastructure, you have to take responsibility for your business using the right technologies, and spending enough effort on learning. I hope that the above experience can perhaps help you getting something started in your own shop.

PS: This is not the only knowledge activity we have at IP Labs. We also have an hour every Friday morning that we use for presentations, videos and retrospectives. I think the more interactive workshops compliment these knowledge meetings nicely.

Comments

  1. Anonymous1/6/10 18:45

    There are not many companies blessed with employees that truly make an effort in making things better, even when they have to fight for it. Kudos!

    A comment on learning: If you're not willing to invest in yourself, why should the company do it?

    On the perhaps more extreme side, 40% of the time should be spent on studying and improving yourself. Too much time is spent making bad software with worse technology and products. Oh well, I won't get too much support on this one I guess :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Open source CMS evaluations

I have now seen three more or less serious open source CMS reviews. First guy to hit the field was Matt Raible ( 1 2 3 4 ), ending up with Drupal , Joomla , Magnolia , OpenCms and MeshCMS being runner-ups. Then there is OpenAdvantage that tries out a handful ( Drupal , Exponent CMS , Lenya , Mambo , and Silva ), including Plone which they use for their own site (funny/annoying that the entire site has no RSS-feeds, nor is it possible to comment on the articles), following Matt's approach by exluding many CMS that seem not to fit the criteria. It is somewhat strange that OpenAdvantage cuts away Magnolia because it "Requires J2EE server; difficult to install and configure; more of a framework than CMS", and proceed to include Apache Lenya in the full evaluation. Magnolia does not require a J2EE server. It runs on Tomcat just like Lenya does (maybe it's an idea to bundle Magnolia with Jetty to make it seem more lightweight). I'm still sure that OpenAdvant

Encrypting and Decrypting with Spring

I was recently working with protecting some sensitive data in a typical Java application with a database underneath. We convert the data on its way out of the application using Spring Security Crypto Utilities . It "was decided" that we'd be doing AES with a key-length of 256 , and this just happens to be the kind of encryption Spring crypto does out of the box. Sweet! The big aber is that whatever JRE is running the application has to be patched with Oracle's JCE  in order to do 256 bits. It's a fascinating story , the short version being that U.S. companies are restricted from exporting various encryption algorithms to certain countries, and some countries are restricted from importing them. Once I had patched my JRE with the JCE, I found it fascinating how straight forward it was to encrypt and decrypt using the Spring Encryptors. So just for fun at the weekend, I threw together a little desktop app that will encrypt and decrypt stuff for the given password

The Git Users Mailing List

A year ago or so, I came across the Git-user mailing list (aka. "Git for human beings"). Over the year, I grew a little addicted to helping people out with their Git problems. When the new git-scm.com webpage launched , and the link to the mailing list had disappeared, I was quick to ask them to add it again . I think this mailing list fills an important hole in the Git community between: The Git developer mailing list git@vger.kernel.org  - which I find to be a bit too hard-core and scary for Git newbies. Besides, the Majordomo mailing list system is pretty archaic, and I personally can't stand browsing or searching in the Gmane archives. The IRC channel #git on Freenode, which is a bit out-of-reach for people who never experienced the glory days of IRC. Furthermore, when the channel is busy, it's a big pain to follow any discussion. StackOverflow questions tagged git , these come pretty close, but it's a bit hard to keep an overview of what questio

Git tools for keeping patches on top of moving upstreams

At work, we maintain patches for some pretty large open source repositories that regularly release new versions, forcing us to update our patches to match. So far, we've been using basic Git operations to transplant our modifications from one major version of the upstream to the next. Every time we make such a transplant, we simply squash together the modifications we made in the previous version, and land it as one big commit into the next version. Those who are used to very stringent keeping of Git history may wrinkle their nose at this, but it is a pragmatic choice. Maintaining modifications on top of the rapidly changing upstream is a lot of work, and so far we haven't had the opportunity to figure out a more clever way to do it. Nor have we really suffered any consequences of not having an easy to read history of our modifications - it's a relatively small amount of patches, after all. With a recent boost in team size, we may have that opportunity. Also the need for be

Managing dot-files with vcsh and myrepos

Say I want to get my dot-files out on a new computer. Here's what I do: # install vcsh & myrepos via apt/brew/etc vcsh clone https://github.com/tfnico/config-mr.git mr mr update Done! All dot-files are ready to use and in place. No deploy command, no linking up symlinks to the files . No checking/out in my entire home directory as a Git repository. Yet, all my dot-files are neatly kept in fine-grained repositories, and any changes I make are immediately ready to be committed: config-atom.git     -> ~/.atom/* config-mr.git     -> ~/.mrconfig     -> ~/.config/mr/* config-tmuxinator.git       -> ~/.tmuxinator/* config-vim.git     -> ~/.vimrc     -> ~/.vim/* config-bin.git        -> ~/bin/* config-git.git               -> ~/.gitconfig config-tmux.git       -> ~/.tmux.conf     config-zsh.git     -> ~/.zshrc How can this be? The key here is to use vcsh to keep track of your dot-files, and its partner myrepos/mr for o