Jazoon 2007: Day 1 Keynote

And we're off. I'm listening to the keynote session. Taking place in a movie theater, seems like the conference is taking place inside some cinema metroplex called Sihl-city, or Movie-City.

We weren't really aware of the size or scale of Jazoon up front. Seeing the amount of people in the theater, it's not too positively surprising. The theater is about 2/3rds full, I think I can count the number of attendees in the hundreds. There is an okay amount of stands, many of which are naturally Swiss companies that I've never heard of, and I'm guessing most of the attendees are Swiss as well. I've only counted 6 Norwegians so far, the three of us from Objectware included. The other three are from Sun, two of them are doing talks on JavaDB later on.

After some welcomes and intros there were some (dry) words from the sponsors, including Andreas Knöpfli, manager Sun, Switzerland, a guy from Elca, Swizz IT service company. Red Herring, some magazine. Farley Duvall is talking bout globalization. Says that central Europe is the most promising part of the world concerning entrepeneur/capital/education and everything.

I'll hand it to them that the media videos in between sessions are pretty cool though.

Then its on to Ted Neward's talk on the past and future of our use of programming languages.

The program in Jazoon is quite Sun-dominated. Was sort of funny to hear Neward bashing early stages of the JDK, and not even mentioning Netbeans when it comes to IDEs.

Ted Neward is a good talker. He sounds and looks abit like Jeff Bridges. Spent alot of time convincing us how much work it is to develop a language from scratch. Goes on into DSL's, easy to develop new languages. Perfect storm. Talking about virtualization and tools and linguistics.
Mentioned Ruby. Green threads. Long story short, there are a lot of possibilites coming up when it comes to us developing and using langues on top the JVM (or any other VM).

Now it's off to lunch. Think I'll catch the talk on Java virtualization after the break.

Comments

Git-SVN Mirror without the annoying update-ref

This post is part of a series on Git and Subversion . To see all the related posts, screencasts and other resources, please click here . So no sooner than I had done my git-svn presentation at JavaZone , I got word of a slightly different Git-SVN mirror setup that makes it a bit easier to work with: In short, my old recipe includes an annoying git update-ref step to keep the git-svn remote reference up to date with the central bare git repo. This new recipe avoids this, so we can simply use git svn dcommit directly. So, longer version, with the details. My original recipe is laid out in five steps: Clone a fresh Git repo from Subversion. This will be our fetching repo. Set up a bare repo. Configure pushing from the fetching repo to bare repo In the shoes of a developer, clone the repo Set up an SVN remote in the developer's repo In the new approach, we redefine those last two steps: (See the original post for how to do the fir...

Git Stash Blooper (Could not restore untracked files from stash)

The other day I accidentally did a git stash -a , which means it stashes *everything*, including ignored output files (target, build, classes, etc). Ooooops.. What I meant to do was git stash -u , meaning stash modifications plus untracked new files. Anyhows, I ended up with a big fat stash I couldn't get back out. Each time I tried, I got something like this: .../target/temp/dozer.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/core.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/joda-time.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/foo.war already exists, no checkout Could not restore untracked files from stash No matter how I tried checking out different revisions (like the one where I actually made the stash), or using --force, I got the same error. Now these were one of those "keep cool for a second, there's a git way to fix this"situation. I figured: A stash is basically a commit. If we look at my recent commits using git log --graph --...

Git-SVN Mirror for multiple branches

This post is part of a series on Git and Subversion . To see all the related posts, screencasts and other resources, please click here . This extends the posts where I explained how to set up a git-svn mirror for a single directory. NOTE: If you just want to use Git against a SVN repo on your own, stop reading ,now, and stick to the git-svn basics. However, if you want a setup where you can share a Git repository with colleagues and friends while still interfacing with Subversion, keep reading. I'll show how to set up a git-svn mirror for a standard Subversion project with trunk , branches and tags . It's a bit like the single directory mirror, but in order to keep all branches in sync, it's a bit more fiddling. The good part is that this setup enables us to cherry-pick commits from one branch to the other. This is slightly smoother than using svn merge . First of all, let's repeat how our Subversion and Git-repositories look physically (roughly the sa...

Git tools for keeping patches on top of moving upstreams

At work, we maintain patches for some pretty large open source repositories that regularly release new versions, forcing us to update our patches to match. So far, we've been using basic Git operations to transplant our modifications from one major version of the upstream to the next. Every time we make such a transplant, we simply squash together the modifications we made in the previous version, and land it as one big commit into the next version. Those who are used to very stringent keeping of Git history may wrinkle their nose at this, but it is a pragmatic choice. Maintaining modifications on top of the rapidly changing upstream is a lot of work, and so far we haven't had the opportunity to figure out a more clever way to do it. Nor have we really suffered any consequences of not having an easy to read history of our modifications - it's a relatively small amount of patches, after all. With a recent boost in team size, we may have that opportunity. Also the need for be...

Syncing your Git repo with the Subversion repo

This post is part of a series on Git and Subversion . To see all the related posts, screencasts and other resources, please click here . This is a follow-up to the previous post on how to live with Git and Suversion in parallel . It's really trivial stuff for any experienced user, but was worth noting down somewhere for my own sake. I've cloned a project called "fudge" from Subversion: >git svn clone https://scm.mycompany.com/svn/fudge So my local repo has the correct svn-remote configuration and all that to go with it inside fudge/.git/svn . This is done automatically when you svn-clone. The bad thing is that all my Git-mates at work have to wait for me doing svn-rebase before they can pull the latest code from Subversion from my repo into theirs. I want to get rid of this responsibility. I'll put something similar to my svn-rebasing repository on a server, have it run svn-rebase regularly, and push the changes to a centralized git repository, ...