Skip to main content

A Better Way to Git Push to Deploy (updateInstead & push-to-checkout)

Wow, nearly a year since my last post. I was sort of thinking it would be something more profound, but here goes: Git recently (with version 2.3) introduced a way of easily pushing changes into a remote non-bare repository, a.k.a. push-to-deploy. The old way would be to have a post-receive hook run some update logic which would do some procedure to update a non-bare repository. There now is a simple way of configuring the target repository to update its work tree instead upon being pushed to.

Now, pushing to the target repo may fail in cases where it has been modified, so soon after, a new push-to-checkout hook was introduced to deal with this, but it will only take effect in Git 2.4. I'll show how to set up both below.

Surprisingly, when searching for "push-to-checkout", I found very few articles about this, even though it was loudly mentioned on the GitHub blog (twice, and on StackOverflow, of course). So here's another one for the googles. Besides, I just wrote this whole example on the Git Users Mailing list and figured I'd repeat it here.

Note that as it happens, I've never found myself in the sorry position of having to deploy this way in real life (real developers package their distributables), so don't take my word this being the way to do it on production systems.

Note that Git version must be >= 2.3 for this to work at all, and must be 2.4 in order for the push-to-checkout hook to take effect.
[master][~/temp/foo-web]$ git --version 
git version 2.3.6 

Take some random repo and clone it to a "remote" location:
[~/temp]$ git clone foo foo-web 
Cloning into 'foo-web'...done.

So, let's pretend that this non-bare repository is on our web-host:
[~/temp]$ cd foo-web

Configure to update on incoming pushes:
[master][~/temp/foo-web]$ git config receive.denyCurrentBranch updateInstead

Create the hook:
[master][~/temp/foo-web]$ vim .git/hooks/push-to-checkout

Contents of the push-to-checkout hook, as exemplified in the test here:

/bin/sh
echo >&2 updating from $(git rev-parse HEAD)
echo >&2 updating to "$1"

git update-index -q --refresh && git read-tree -u -m HEAD "$1" || {
    status=$?
    echo >&2 read-tree failed
    exit $status
}

Make the hook executable
[master][~/temp/foo-web]$ chmod +x .git/hooks/push-to-checkout

Now let's take it for a spin. Go back to the original repo:
[master][~/temp/foo-web]$ cd .. 
[~/temp]$ cd foo 
[master][~/temp/foo]$ git remote add web ../foo-web 
[master][~/temp/foo]$ git push web master 
Everything up-to-date

OK, that wasn't very impressive. Make some changes first, a new file heya.txt for example:
[master][~/temp/foo]$ echo `random_word` > heya.txt; git add .;git commit -m `random_word` 
[master b6765e2] overpaint 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 heya.txt

Away we go:
[master][~/temp/foo]$ git push web master 
Counting objects: 3, done. 
Delta compression using up to 4 threads. 
Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done. 
Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 322 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done. 
Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) 
To ../foo-web 
   eb2711a..b6765e2  master -> master 
Push succeeded! Now, let's see if our new file arrived OK:
[master][~/temp/foo]$ cd .. 
[~/temp]$ cd foo-web

Tada!
[master][~/temp/foo-web]$ ls 
README   foo      heya.txt



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Open source CMS evaluations

I have now seen three more or less serious open source CMS reviews. First guy to hit the field was Matt Raible ( 1 2 3 4 ), ending up with Drupal , Joomla , Magnolia , OpenCms and MeshCMS being runner-ups. Then there is OpenAdvantage that tries out a handful ( Drupal , Exponent CMS , Lenya , Mambo , and Silva ), including Plone which they use for their own site (funny/annoying that the entire site has no RSS-feeds, nor is it possible to comment on the articles), following Matt's approach by exluding many CMS that seem not to fit the criteria. It is somewhat strange that OpenAdvantage cuts away Magnolia because it "Requires J2EE server; difficult to install and configure; more of a framework than CMS", and proceed to include Apache Lenya in the full evaluation. Magnolia does not require a J2EE server. It runs on Tomcat just like Lenya does (maybe it's an idea to bundle Magnolia with Jetty to make it seem more lightweight). I'm still sure that OpenAdvant

Considerations for JavaScript in Modern (2013) Java/Maven Projects

Disclaimer: I'm a Java developer, not a JavaScript developer. This is just what I've picked up the last years plus a little research the last days. It's just a snapshot of my current knowledge and opinions on the day of writing, apt to change over the next weeks/months. We've gone all modern in our web applications, doing MVC on the client side with AngularJS or Ember , building single-page webapps with REST backends. But how are we managing the growing amount of JavaScript in our application? Yeoman 's logo (not necessarily the conclusion of this blog post) You ain't in Kansas anymore So far we've just been doing half-random stuff. We download some version of a library and throw it into our src/main/webapp/js/lib , or we use it from a CDN , which may be down or unreachable when we want to use the application.. Some times the JS is minified, other times it's not. Some times we name the file with version number, other times without. Some

Git Stash Blooper (Could not restore untracked files from stash)

The other day I accidentally did a git stash -a , which means it stashes *everything*, including ignored output files (target, build, classes, etc). Ooooops.. What I meant to do was git stash -u , meaning stash modifications plus untracked new files. Anyhows, I ended up with a big fat stash I couldn't get back out. Each time I tried, I got something like this: .../target/temp/dozer.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/core.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/joda-time.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/foo.war already exists, no checkout Could not restore untracked files from stash No matter how I tried checking out different revisions (like the one where I actually made the stash), or using --force, I got the same error. Now these were one of those "keep cool for a second, there's a git way to fix this"situation. I figured: A stash is basically a commit. If we look at my recent commits using   git log --graph --

Managing dot-files with vcsh and myrepos

Say I want to get my dot-files out on a new computer. Here's what I do: # install vcsh & myrepos via apt/brew/etc vcsh clone https://github.com/tfnico/config-mr.git mr mr update Done! All dot-files are ready to use and in place. No deploy command, no linking up symlinks to the files . No checking/out in my entire home directory as a Git repository. Yet, all my dot-files are neatly kept in fine-grained repositories, and any changes I make are immediately ready to be committed: config-atom.git     -> ~/.atom/* config-mr.git     -> ~/.mrconfig     -> ~/.config/mr/* config-tmuxinator.git       -> ~/.tmuxinator/* config-vim.git     -> ~/.vimrc     -> ~/.vim/* config-bin.git        -> ~/bin/* config-git.git               -> ~/.gitconfig config-tmux.git       -> ~/.tmux.conf     config-zsh.git     -> ~/.zshrc How can this be? The key here is to use vcsh to keep track of your dot-files, and its partner myrepos/mr for o

Leaving eyeo

Thirteen blog posts later, this one notes my departure from eyeo after 4 years and 3 months. I joined eyeo around the headcount of 80 employees, and now I think there's just over 250 people there. My role coming in was as operations manager, doing a mix of infrastructure engineering and technical project management. I later on took on organizational development to help the company deal with its growing pains . We introduced cross-functional teams, departments (kind of like guilds), new leadership structures, goal-setting frameworks, onboarding processes and career frameworks.  And all of this in a rapidly growing distributed company. I'm proud and happy that for a long time I knew every employee by name and got to meet every single new-hire through training them on company structure and processes.  At some point, we had enough experienced leaders and organizational developers that I could zoom back in on working in one team, consulting them on  Git and continuous integration