Skip to main content

Sharing the knowledge

This post is going to a bit about what I've been doing lately. Well, like any other developer I've been mostly busy with getting the projects released before the big July. But I've also been past-timing a bit on setting up a new wiki.

Yay, I don't have to be the wiki techie any more!

It's been well over a year since I started managing Objectware's Confluence installation. As expected, it was very little work. Confluence basically runs itself once it's set up. Mostly it was upgrading, administering content (deleting and cleaning), doing the odd restart or log-watching. Eventually, after a year or so, the hosting of the wiki was outsourced to a nearby hosting company, cause our instance's database was starting to run a bit slow, and my billing rates were a bit high (hey, I'm a consultant, after all) :)

So good riddance, finally no more booring IT-support work.

Or do I...

Well, not until two months later, anyway. I was asked by a colleague, who's a core driver of our internal Solaris-group (I'll let him remain nameless right now, but he desevers all credit for this stuff), to participate in our latest venture, which I'll get back to, but first..

About two years ago..

I was discussing the still immature wiki with the boss. Already we were seeing effects of decay and staleness in the quickly growing content. He asked me what we should do about it, and I said "I honestly think we should just open it up.". He gave a small laugh and said that was not very realistic. And it wasn't. Too much confidential customer stuff was mixed in with the pure knowledge about various open source projects and tools.

Well, since then our wiki has grown and matured. It is better structured and filled with a lot of good content (much to the credit of the nameless guy mentioned earlier).

Some stats..

It's a meager 3.418 pages. You could be worried that it's a bunch of useless pages, but these pages count 29.555 edits, or nearly 9 edits per page, which I'm guessing is a good number for an internal wiki. 159 different authors have contributed to the content, and there are over 2.000 attachments.

Now, finally due to a lot of internal efforts (not many of which were my own, to be frank), the political descision has been made to open up *some* of the content.


So we took an evening and set it up on our new fancy Sun/Solaris box. Did I mention how easy/great it was to set up a Solaris with a database and Confluence? Well, I did get someone else to do the dirty work of setting up and configuring the zone, but after that it was real easy :)

But why, you ask? Why take our hard-earned intellectual property worth hundreds of hours of consultant hours and just share them with everyone?

Open source, open knowledge

Well, first thing is that the knowledge in those pages isn't worth more than how much they are used. If more people use them, the (especially Java) community can benefit as a whole, and make our work easier/more fun. We have to work with our competitors on many projects, so if we can help them for example understand how to set up a Maven enterprise infrastructure, then we will benefit as well in the long run.

Good PR

Well, obvious argument isn't it :)

We needed a good wiki for these open source projects

We wished to host a Confluence for the Backward Compatibility Tester and the EDR project. More will probably follow soon. Sorry CollabNet, but your wiki sucks.

We need help!

We want input from other people who have experiences with the tools we use. We're hoping that people will contribute back with either their knowledge, or link to places where it exists on the net.

Why it might be a bad idea..

My main concern is that we'll get some negative reactions claiming we are duplicating/harnessing documentation which should reside other places. Well, we're too impatient to wait for these other places to update their FAQs and wiki pages with our stuff. If they wish they can just copy the content back to their sites whenever they feel like it.

There are some other concerns, like what license should we use, spam-prevention, and cross-wiki search (well, atleast now we can search the wiki with Google).

And finally, it might just not take off because people might be too shy to write stuff on the public wiki. Well, we'll see how it goes. No matter what, it will be my (and some others) way of sharing stuff with partners and other people in the community when we want to get some content *out there* quickly. Feel free to use it for the same.

It's not more than 81 pages out there yet, but take a look at the Smidig 2.0 stuff. It has a lot of good stuff about Maven and testing strategies, among other things. We've tried to keep all of it in English but some of it is still Norwegian, unfortunately. Smidig 2.0 roughly translates into "Agile 2.0" and is our pet-name for practices that have evolved after the first wave of agile bubbles. If you know Norwegian you can take a look at Totto's presentation from the Smidig 2007 conference for some more thoughts on that.


Popular posts from this blog

Open source CMS evaluations

I have now seen three more or less serious open source CMS reviews. First guy to hit the field was Matt Raible ( 1 2 3 4 ), ending up with Drupal , Joomla , Magnolia , OpenCms and MeshCMS being runner-ups. Then there is OpenAdvantage that tries out a handful ( Drupal , Exponent CMS , Lenya , Mambo , and Silva ), including Plone which they use for their own site (funny/annoying that the entire site has no RSS-feeds, nor is it possible to comment on the articles), following Matt's approach by exluding many CMS that seem not to fit the criteria. It is somewhat strange that OpenAdvantage cuts away Magnolia because it "Requires J2EE server; difficult to install and configure; more of a framework than CMS", and proceed to include Apache Lenya in the full evaluation. Magnolia does not require a J2EE server. It runs on Tomcat just like Lenya does (maybe it's an idea to bundle Magnolia with Jetty to make it seem more lightweight). I'm still sure that OpenAdvant

What I've Learned After a Month of Podcasting

So, it's been about a month since I launched   GitMinutes , and wow, it's been a fun ride. I have gotten a lot of feedback, and a lot more downloads/listeners than I had expected! Judging the numbers is hard, but a generous estimate is that somewhere around 2000-3000 have listened to the podcast, and about 500-1000 regularly download. Considering that only a percentage of my target audience actively listen to podcasts, these are some pretty good numbers. I've heard that 10% of the general population in the western world regularly listen to podcasts (probably a bit higher percentage among Git users), so I like to think I've reached a big chunk of the Git pros out there. GitMinutes has gathered 110 followers on Twitter, and 63, erm.. circlers on Google+, and it has received 117 +'es! And it's been flattr'ed twice :) Here are some of the things I learned during this last month: Conceptually.. Starting my own sandbox podcast for trying out everythin

Considerations for JavaScript in Modern (2013) Java/Maven Projects

Disclaimer: I'm a Java developer, not a JavaScript developer. This is just what I've picked up the last years plus a little research the last days. It's just a snapshot of my current knowledge and opinions on the day of writing, apt to change over the next weeks/months. We've gone all modern in our web applications, doing MVC on the client side with AngularJS or Ember , building single-page webapps with REST backends. But how are we managing the growing amount of JavaScript in our application? Yeoman 's logo (not necessarily the conclusion of this blog post) You ain't in Kansas anymore So far we've just been doing half-random stuff. We download some version of a library and throw it into our src/main/webapp/js/lib , or we use it from a CDN , which may be down or unreachable when we want to use the application.. Some times the JS is minified, other times it's not. Some times we name the file with version number, other times without. Some

Managing dot-files with vcsh and myrepos

Say I want to get my dot-files out on a new computer. Here's what I do: # install vcsh & myrepos via apt/brew/etc vcsh clone mr mr update Done! All dot-files are ready to use and in place. No deploy command, no linking up symlinks to the files . No checking/out in my entire home directory as a Git repository. Yet, all my dot-files are neatly kept in fine-grained repositories, and any changes I make are immediately ready to be committed: config-atom.git     -> ~/.atom/* config-mr.git     -> ~/.mrconfig     -> ~/.config/mr/* config-tmuxinator.git       -> ~/.tmuxinator/* config-vim.git     -> ~/.vimrc     -> ~/.vim/* config-bin.git        -> ~/bin/* config-git.git               -> ~/.gitconfig config-tmux.git       -> ~/.tmux.conf     config-zsh.git     -> ~/.zshrc How can this be? The key here is to use vcsh to keep track of your dot-files, and its partner myrepos/mr for o

Git Stash Blooper (Could not restore untracked files from stash)

The other day I accidentally did a git stash -a , which means it stashes *everything*, including ignored output files (target, build, classes, etc). Ooooops.. What I meant to do was git stash -u , meaning stash modifications plus untracked new files. Anyhows, I ended up with a big fat stash I couldn't get back out. Each time I tried, I got something like this: .../target/temp/dozer.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/core.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/joda-time.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/foo.war already exists, no checkout Could not restore untracked files from stash No matter how I tried checking out different revisions (like the one where I actually made the stash), or using --force, I got the same error. Now these were one of those "keep cool for a second, there's a git way to fix this"situation. I figured: A stash is basically a commit. If we look at my recent commits using   git log --graph --