Skip to main content

My excuse for not blogging the last month

Recent activities eating away blog-activity include mostly JAFS - our annual internal weekend getaway. JAFS essentially means hauling our ~40 Java-programming colleagues off to a desolate hotel for a weekend, doing not so much else than having fun programming (and shooting some paintball).

The concept of the weekend's tasks are based on the following:
  1. Divide the gang into 5 groups
  2. Present some technologies that are core, meaning everyone of us should know by heart (for instance Spring and Maven)
  3. Present some new technologies that are hot, and might come in handy in the near future (for instance JRuby and OpenESB)
  4. Do some cool programming competition that makes use of above technologies
These points demand a mass of preperations. We've been 5 people spending evenings and weekends planning the event for the last month.

First we spent a whole load of time settling on which tehcnologies to focus on. See we've got four different camps of technology groups in Objectware, each of which are tugging in different directions, mainly core, web, integration and enterprise design & architecture. I like to believe we achieved doing a fair divide between the different camps, since these four camps are paying for the whole ordeal ;)

We also spent alot of time agreeing on the programming competition. Well, we actually settled on not doing a programming competition, instead focusing on cooperation between the 5 teams. Instead of having different teams compete over who could do the best implementation using different technologies (like we did last year), each team were to implement parts of a larger system which would cooperate using services across an ESB.

The system itself was sort of a collaboration suite framework, based on Subversion commits, Continous Integration and a robot. The ultimate functionality of the system: If you break the build, lil' Timmy here will come driving into your cubicle and steal your beer.



To be honest the solution will not be used directly, but the codebase does contain alot of good reference implementation of the various technologies we involved. We also got a good heap of discussions regarding among other things:
Oh, another thing we had to do in advance: we spent a whole lot of time implementing Proof-of-Concepts on each tecnhology to help the teams get started once they got up there. Now there was a learning experience :)

Aaand, the number one rule of bringing 40 programmers to a hotel: DO NOT TRUST THE NETWORK! Excactly. Even if the hotel has promised you full wireless, it ain't gonna work with 30 people who are trying to connect to the Maven repository, Subversion, etc etc.

So, we set up a mighty fine Ubuntu box with the following:
  • DHCP-service for allocating all the teams an address on our subnet (jafs.objectware.no)
  • DNS/bind for all the interal addresses on the domain
  • Subversion repo on svn.jafs.objectware.no
  • Continous Integration server on ci.jafs.objectware.no
  • Maven repositories on repo.jafs.objectware.no (snapshot-repo, release-repo and site-repo)
  • IRC server (of course!) on irc.jafs.objectware.no
And of course we brought along 40 TP-cables and a handful of switches to provide each contender with wired network.

Now it might seem like a bunch of uneccesary mumbo to setup all these wires, aliases and services, but believe me we all appreciated being able to just hook into a 100/1000-MBit network and be up and running. Zero network problems, I tell ye :)

So that was JAFS... Right after we were done I had to get ready for delivering my 10 minute lightning talk on Smidig 2007 (the Norwegian Agile-community's first conference). The conference was as impressive in implementation as was its lack of up-front planning (taking about two months to prepare, was it?).

The conference left me inspired and hungry for more. If I remember, the next post will be about distributed continous integration.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Open source CMS evaluations

I have now seen three more or less serious open source CMS reviews. First guy to hit the field was Matt Raible ( 1 2 3 4 ), ending up with Drupal , Joomla , Magnolia , OpenCms and MeshCMS being runner-ups. Then there is OpenAdvantage that tries out a handful ( Drupal , Exponent CMS , Lenya , Mambo , and Silva ), including Plone which they use for their own site (funny/annoying that the entire site has no RSS-feeds, nor is it possible to comment on the articles), following Matt's approach by exluding many CMS that seem not to fit the criteria. It is somewhat strange that OpenAdvantage cuts away Magnolia because it "Requires J2EE server; difficult to install and configure; more of a framework than CMS", and proceed to include Apache Lenya in the full evaluation. Magnolia does not require a J2EE server. It runs on Tomcat just like Lenya does (maybe it's an idea to bundle Magnolia with Jetty to make it seem more lightweight). I'm still sure that OpenAdvant...
6 comments
Read more

Git tools for keeping patches on top of moving upstreams

At work, we maintain patches for some pretty large open source repositories that regularly release new versions, forcing us to update our patches to match. So far, we've been using basic Git operations to transplant our modifications from one major version of the upstream to the next. Every time we make such a transplant, we simply squash together the modifications we made in the previous version, and land it as one big commit into the next version. Those who are used to very stringent keeping of Git history may wrinkle their nose at this, but it is a pragmatic choice. Maintaining modifications on top of the rapidly changing upstream is a lot of work, and so far we haven't had the opportunity to figure out a more clever way to do it. Nor have we really suffered any consequences of not having an easy to read history of our modifications - it's a relatively small amount of patches, after all. With a recent boost in team size, we may have that opportunity. Also the need for be...
1 comment
Read more

The Git Users Mailing List

A year ago or so, I came across the Git-user mailing list (aka. "Git for human beings"). Over the year, I grew a little addicted to helping people out with their Git problems. When the new git-scm.com webpage launched , and the link to the mailing list had disappeared, I was quick to ask them to add it again . I think this mailing list fills an important hole in the Git community between: The Git developer mailing list git@vger.kernel.org  - which I find to be a bit too hard-core and scary for Git newbies. Besides, the Majordomo mailing list system is pretty archaic, and I personally can't stand browsing or searching in the Gmane archives. The IRC channel #git on Freenode, which is a bit out-of-reach for people who never experienced the glory days of IRC. Furthermore, when the channel is busy, it's a big pain to follow any discussion. StackOverflow questions tagged git , these come pretty close, but it's a bit hard to keep an overview of what questio...
Post a Comment
Read more

Git-SVN Mirror without the annoying update-ref

This post is part of  a series on Git and Subversion . To see all the related posts, screencasts and other resources, please  click here .  So no sooner than I had done my git-svn presentation at JavaZone , I got word of a slightly different Git-SVN mirror setup that makes it a bit easier to work with: In short, my old recipe includes an annoying git update-ref step to keep the git-svn remote reference up to date with the central bare git repo. This new recipe avoids this, so we can simply use git svn dcommit   directly. So, longer version, with the details. My original recipe is laid out in five steps: Clone a fresh Git repo from Subversion. This will be our  fetching repo. Set up a  bare repo. Configure pushing from the fetching repo to bare repo In the shoes of a developer, clone the repo Set up an SVN remote in the developer's repo In the new approach, we redefine those last two steps: (See the original post for how to do the fir...
17 comments
Read more

Git Stash Blooper (Could not restore untracked files from stash)

The other day I accidentally did a git stash -a , which means it stashes *everything*, including ignored output files (target, build, classes, etc). Ooooops.. What I meant to do was git stash -u , meaning stash modifications plus untracked new files. Anyhows, I ended up with a big fat stash I couldn't get back out. Each time I tried, I got something like this: .../target/temp/dozer.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/core.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/joda-time.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/foo.war already exists, no checkout Could not restore untracked files from stash No matter how I tried checking out different revisions (like the one where I actually made the stash), or using --force, I got the same error. Now these were one of those "keep cool for a second, there's a git way to fix this"situation. I figured: A stash is basically a commit. If we look at my recent commits using   git log --graph --...
12 comments
Read more