Skip to main content

Some writing tips

Having delivered the thesis, I've figured out how I'm going to use this blog.

I'm going to continue posting here, writing about web content management, but also about software development in general and other stuff. But the first thing I want to note down are my thoughts on how it was to write the thesis, sharing some writing tips with you.

Writing English

My first advice is: Don't. Unless its your native language, of course. I have had the pleasure of a bi-lingual upbringing, and seeing the English of many other Norwegians, I'm sorry to that generally, Norwegians write lousy English. Its not that we make grammatical or syntactical errors, but the feeling of the sentence is just.. wrong. And don't be fooled: Word or any other another spell-checker is not good enough. I've gone over another thesis which was already "fixed" by Word, and I still managed to empty a red-ink pen in the process.

Another point is that you don't *think* in English. You keep falling back into articulating difficult sentences in your native language, and then you have to translate it. This breaks down productivity, and you also get those Norwegian-English sentences.

If you still have to write English, make sure you know a native speaker who will go over the thesis for you and point out any mistakes and sentences you should reformulate. Train. Write English, and read English books aloud.

Writing flow

Write down what you think. Use notebooks, and get things down. You can always remove things later. Or don't delete things, just move them over to a "snippets" document, saving your thoughts in case you want to include them later (you could always blog about them).

Don't read your thesis too many times. You get tired of it. Write things once, and move on to the next section. Write through what you wrote a month ago. This will give you a fresh view of the content and allow you to

Turn off the spell-checker when you are writing. Those red-lines are also disrupting your writing flow.

Sentence rythm

Bad sentence structures easily bore the reader. Think short-medium-long-medium-short and so on.

Don't use too many "helping" verbs. The subject verbs the object. To will, to be, to have, are helping verbs you can put around the verb, but avoid this. Put the power of the senctence in the verb. Can't think of any good examples right now, but I might get back to that. Also, reduce the amount of adjectives, and put the meaning of them in the verb if this is possible.

Structure and Disposition

Write a disposition. You'll change it later, removing or adding chapters as you see how things are coming along, but a good disposition is the skeleton of your thesis. Write through it many times, each time adding a little more flesh to the bone (ugh, nice picture).

Document-driven development

Plan, and keep track of your changes. I kept a Todo-list. When I completed an item on the list, I moved it to the changelog . Each time I thought of something I should write about, I added it to the Todo-list. I also made checklist, where I added things each time I though "Oh. I'll have to see if that thing is done through the whole document". It was something like this

  • Acronyms (WCM, WCMS, ECM, XML, JSP, WS, JSR, JCP, JCR, WYSIWYG)
  • Use of modification/extensibility/extendability/customization or variations of these
  • Use of company/organisation/corporation
  • Use of "you", "I", "we" etc.
  • Upper Cases in Headings
  • Who am I? Programmer/developer/technician/researcher/author , we, I, our, us, me,
  • Who is the user? user/author/content manager/customer/visitor
  • A/applet, J/java
  • Check that all h3 are default formatting (some small ones)
  • Remove apostrophes' (Don't use apostrophes in formal documents.)

Red flags

Stay clear of these, or reformulate them:
  • very
  • little
  • think
  • I thought
  • easy
  • hard
  • seem

The reader

Learn the mind of the reader. I read this book which had some good points on how your thesis is read. For example, the reader wants to see a crystallized research question.

Any how, that's all I've got time for now. I've got some other ideas as well, but I'll have to add them later.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Open source CMS evaluations

I have now seen three more or less serious open source CMS reviews. First guy to hit the field was Matt Raible ( 1 2 3 4 ), ending up with Drupal , Joomla , Magnolia , OpenCms and MeshCMS being runner-ups. Then there is OpenAdvantage that tries out a handful ( Drupal , Exponent CMS , Lenya , Mambo , and Silva ), including Plone which they use for their own site (funny/annoying that the entire site has no RSS-feeds, nor is it possible to comment on the articles), following Matt's approach by exluding many CMS that seem not to fit the criteria. It is somewhat strange that OpenAdvantage cuts away Magnolia because it "Requires J2EE server; difficult to install and configure; more of a framework than CMS", and proceed to include Apache Lenya in the full evaluation. Magnolia does not require a J2EE server. It runs on Tomcat just like Lenya does (maybe it's an idea to bundle Magnolia with Jetty to make it seem more lightweight). I'm still sure that OpenAdvant

Encrypting and Decrypting with Spring

I was recently working with protecting some sensitive data in a typical Java application with a database underneath. We convert the data on its way out of the application using Spring Security Crypto Utilities . It "was decided" that we'd be doing AES with a key-length of 256 , and this just happens to be the kind of encryption Spring crypto does out of the box. Sweet! The big aber is that whatever JRE is running the application has to be patched with Oracle's JCE  in order to do 256 bits. It's a fascinating story , the short version being that U.S. companies are restricted from exporting various encryption algorithms to certain countries, and some countries are restricted from importing them. Once I had patched my JRE with the JCE, I found it fascinating how straight forward it was to encrypt and decrypt using the Spring Encryptors. So just for fun at the weekend, I threw together a little desktop app that will encrypt and decrypt stuff for the given password

The Git Users Mailing List

A year ago or so, I came across the Git-user mailing list (aka. "Git for human beings"). Over the year, I grew a little addicted to helping people out with their Git problems. When the new git-scm.com webpage launched , and the link to the mailing list had disappeared, I was quick to ask them to add it again . I think this mailing list fills an important hole in the Git community between: The Git developer mailing list git@vger.kernel.org  - which I find to be a bit too hard-core and scary for Git newbies. Besides, the Majordomo mailing list system is pretty archaic, and I personally can't stand browsing or searching in the Gmane archives. The IRC channel #git on Freenode, which is a bit out-of-reach for people who never experienced the glory days of IRC. Furthermore, when the channel is busy, it's a big pain to follow any discussion. StackOverflow questions tagged git , these come pretty close, but it's a bit hard to keep an overview of what questio

Git tools for keeping patches on top of moving upstreams

At work, we maintain patches for some pretty large open source repositories that regularly release new versions, forcing us to update our patches to match. So far, we've been using basic Git operations to transplant our modifications from one major version of the upstream to the next. Every time we make such a transplant, we simply squash together the modifications we made in the previous version, and land it as one big commit into the next version. Those who are used to very stringent keeping of Git history may wrinkle their nose at this, but it is a pragmatic choice. Maintaining modifications on top of the rapidly changing upstream is a lot of work, and so far we haven't had the opportunity to figure out a more clever way to do it. Nor have we really suffered any consequences of not having an easy to read history of our modifications - it's a relatively small amount of patches, after all. With a recent boost in team size, we may have that opportunity. Also the need for be

Managing dot-files with vcsh and myrepos

Say I want to get my dot-files out on a new computer. Here's what I do: # install vcsh & myrepos via apt/brew/etc vcsh clone https://github.com/tfnico/config-mr.git mr mr update Done! All dot-files are ready to use and in place. No deploy command, no linking up symlinks to the files . No checking/out in my entire home directory as a Git repository. Yet, all my dot-files are neatly kept in fine-grained repositories, and any changes I make are immediately ready to be committed: config-atom.git     -> ~/.atom/* config-mr.git     -> ~/.mrconfig     -> ~/.config/mr/* config-tmuxinator.git       -> ~/.tmuxinator/* config-vim.git     -> ~/.vimrc     -> ~/.vim/* config-bin.git        -> ~/bin/* config-git.git               -> ~/.gitconfig config-tmux.git       -> ~/.tmux.conf     config-zsh.git     -> ~/.zshrc How can this be? The key here is to use vcsh to keep track of your dot-files, and its partner myrepos/mr for o