Skip to main content

Some notes from work..

Some thoughts from the early planning at P...


Clarification on the component model

We need to define the components with all their properties, relations and functions. Perhaps some patterns from the JSF model can be used.

How is Content stored in the repository? Same way as in View? Should we seperate the Content-objects from Areas until they are published? This is related to workflow and document process routines, I guess. Note that it is important to maintain a modifiable workflow in the tools. Some smaller business will require a 1-step towards publishing an article, larger enterprises will need an x-step process involving collaboration from several stakeholders (author, publisher, editor).


Area is a meta-wrapper for content which describes how the Content will appear live (online).

Different sorts of Areas include Site, Page, Frame, Category, and so on. Literally all sorts of seperating folders that show up in the site map.

Traditionally, an object in a CMS (an article) is defined with meta-data which defines the graphical View of the object. This is per MVC, wrong! A news-article is usually put in a news-folder. This adds meta-data to the object, saying "This object is part of the News-category.". This wouldn't be a problem if it wasn't directly connected to the View of the site. If you're article is independant of View, then how come it is lying in the news-folder? What if you want to publish the same article in another folder? You could fix it by inserting a reference, but that would be a hack.

TODO: Clarify the point above :)

An Area contains other Areas and/or a reference to Content (a content object. We used to call these components, but still haven't figured out a better name for them).


A Content object is independant of the view and the Area(s) in which it resides.

Typical content objects: Article, Post, Comment, Webshop-item, Announcement

Attributes: Privilegie[], Action[], MetaTag[], language, Text[], WorkflowStatus, Dates

Operations: search, syndicate, modify, publish, crudImage, crudText, , move, reference

Template (is applied through a renderer on a Content object, resulting in a live object. The result will typically be an XML-snippet, like HTML or WML, or perhaps pure text):

Types: Article (title, subtitle, ingres, main, images), ArticlePreview (title, subtitle, ingres, thumbnail)

Images

Types: Thumbnail, NormalImage, ResizedImage, Logo

Attributter: title, MetaTag[]


Text

Types: title, subtitle, ingres, preview, mai, date

Attributes: Text (er meta-data i seg selv)

Operations: Rename, edit, internationalize


Requirements

These could resolve in a couple of user stories that will affect the component model. We don't need to model stories for obvious and primitive CRUD operations, but nifty stories that are required by the uses.

Elaborate the use of modules and how we will combine Actions and Components. How many of the data object should be predefined?

Typical CMS features

User/privilege/credentials/DRM/group and role-management

User interface - Usability

Authoring/editing - Core functiona

Integration of content - The jig-zaw

Meta-data - Adding value to information

Work process - Gate-setting

Templates - The dresses of a CMS

Version management - Påliterlighet

Globalization - Internationalization (i18n)

Rendering (page-generation) - Dynamics

Searching - Searchability/Findability

Personalization - Portals

Privileges - Access to the CMS

Syndication - Sharing content

Cross-media-publishing - Variation of access


Typical roles:

Author - composes articles, posts pictures

Manger - Check, confirm and submit new content

Adminstrator - Manage users, groups, user settings and order of authorization

Web-desinger - Design web layouts, pictures and styles

Sys-integrator - System components, object linkings


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Open source CMS evaluations

I have now seen three more or less serious open source CMS reviews. First guy to hit the field was Matt Raible ( 1 2 3 4 ), ending up with Drupal , Joomla , Magnolia , OpenCms and MeshCMS being runner-ups. Then there is OpenAdvantage that tries out a handful ( Drupal , Exponent CMS , Lenya , Mambo , and Silva ), including Plone which they use for their own site (funny/annoying that the entire site has no RSS-feeds, nor is it possible to comment on the articles), following Matt's approach by exluding many CMS that seem not to fit the criteria. It is somewhat strange that OpenAdvantage cuts away Magnolia because it "Requires J2EE server; difficult to install and configure; more of a framework than CMS", and proceed to include Apache Lenya in the full evaluation. Magnolia does not require a J2EE server. It runs on Tomcat just like Lenya does (maybe it's an idea to bundle Magnolia with Jetty to make it seem more lightweight). I'm still sure that OpenAdvant...
6 comments
Read more

Git tools for keeping patches on top of moving upstreams

At work, we maintain patches for some pretty large open source repositories that regularly release new versions, forcing us to update our patches to match. So far, we've been using basic Git operations to transplant our modifications from one major version of the upstream to the next. Every time we make such a transplant, we simply squash together the modifications we made in the previous version, and land it as one big commit into the next version. Those who are used to very stringent keeping of Git history may wrinkle their nose at this, but it is a pragmatic choice. Maintaining modifications on top of the rapidly changing upstream is a lot of work, and so far we haven't had the opportunity to figure out a more clever way to do it. Nor have we really suffered any consequences of not having an easy to read history of our modifications - it's a relatively small amount of patches, after all. With a recent boost in team size, we may have that opportunity. Also the need for be...
1 comment
Read more

The Git Users Mailing List

A year ago or so, I came across the Git-user mailing list (aka. "Git for human beings"). Over the year, I grew a little addicted to helping people out with their Git problems. When the new git-scm.com webpage launched , and the link to the mailing list had disappeared, I was quick to ask them to add it again . I think this mailing list fills an important hole in the Git community between: The Git developer mailing list git@vger.kernel.org  - which I find to be a bit too hard-core and scary for Git newbies. Besides, the Majordomo mailing list system is pretty archaic, and I personally can't stand browsing or searching in the Gmane archives. The IRC channel #git on Freenode, which is a bit out-of-reach for people who never experienced the glory days of IRC. Furthermore, when the channel is busy, it's a big pain to follow any discussion. StackOverflow questions tagged git , these come pretty close, but it's a bit hard to keep an overview of what questio...
Post a Comment
Read more

Git-SVN Mirror without the annoying update-ref

This post is part of  a series on Git and Subversion . To see all the related posts, screencasts and other resources, please  click here .  So no sooner than I had done my git-svn presentation at JavaZone , I got word of a slightly different Git-SVN mirror setup that makes it a bit easier to work with: In short, my old recipe includes an annoying git update-ref step to keep the git-svn remote reference up to date with the central bare git repo. This new recipe avoids this, so we can simply use git svn dcommit   directly. So, longer version, with the details. My original recipe is laid out in five steps: Clone a fresh Git repo from Subversion. This will be our  fetching repo. Set up a  bare repo. Configure pushing from the fetching repo to bare repo In the shoes of a developer, clone the repo Set up an SVN remote in the developer's repo In the new approach, we redefine those last two steps: (See the original post for how to do the fir...
17 comments
Read more

Git Stash Blooper (Could not restore untracked files from stash)

The other day I accidentally did a git stash -a , which means it stashes *everything*, including ignored output files (target, build, classes, etc). Ooooops.. What I meant to do was git stash -u , meaning stash modifications plus untracked new files. Anyhows, I ended up with a big fat stash I couldn't get back out. Each time I tried, I got something like this: .../target/temp/dozer.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/core.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/temp/joda-time.jar already exists, no checkout .../target/foo.war already exists, no checkout Could not restore untracked files from stash No matter how I tried checking out different revisions (like the one where I actually made the stash), or using --force, I got the same error. Now these were one of those "keep cool for a second, there's a git way to fix this"situation. I figured: A stash is basically a commit. If we look at my recent commits using   git log --graph --...
12 comments
Read more