Skip to main content

How To Defeat Piracy and Conquer The Movie Industry With One Box

Some weeks ago, a friend of mine was tweeting about the crappiness of DRM and the movie industry. Well, actually I think all my friends have complained about this at one point or another. You know what the problem is (read anything by Cory Doctorow if you need more material).

Instead of chiming along as usual, I decided to counter with:
"Why don't you as a programmer come up with something better yourself?"
The discussion that ensued gave me an idea for a business/product that I'll share here. Feel free to steal the idea and build the "BetaBox"!
Imagine we built a solution for buying movies & series with all the problems of today's services removed. Imagine Hulu or Netflix, only with *all* movies and series, not just crappy old ones. It's not like Spotify is dominated by music from the 80-90's, and the newest songs are from two year's back, right?

Additionally, all content can be streamed or downloaded onto all your various devices. 

Now, the argument against building this service is that it won't float with the movie industry. They'll never allow downloading DRM-free files, and they won't release movies as early as they would hit the cinema, all in fear of losing revenue due to less people paying for cinema tickets, and broader piracy due to ease of ripping/copying.

However, I suggest that the movie industry hasn't moved to support downloading movies, for the simple reason that they can't be bothered. The majority of consumers don't want to deal with the collection of big movie files along with meta-data. Maybe you can be bothered, but my mom can not.

But what if you had a box with software that would just handle that for you, accompanied by apps for mobile devices and consoles?

Download once, and it would organize everything for you, and make it available for streaming to every device in your household. A bit like XBMC, only it is backed by a Netflix-like professional service, or rather several of them. You could also transfer files or cache for off-line viewing (bring the tablet in the car for kids watching a movie).

The BetaBox is portable, can run on car- or embedded battery power and doubles as a WiFi-router. So you bring it with you in your hotel-room, cabin in the woods, and so on.

The next challenge is to make this device useful before the movie industry agrees on supporting it. My solution for this is for the box to take in the movies you've already own. Rip them off CD's, DVD's and BlueRays. The industry has done what they can to make it illegal to rip DVD's and BlueRays, but this protection doesn't really make sense, and several countries (at least in Norway, I believe) it is allowed to rip DVDs and BlueRays for private use. In countries where ripping is not allowed, the feature would have to be disabled, but hopefully the public would rise to change these (rather nonsensical) laws over time. Maybe one could do something like iCloud's Match thing, where the BetaBox would recognize that you're rightfully own a movie (by inserting your disk), and after that you could just download it whenever.


Now, there are some open-ended questions like how to handle synchronization between multiple boxes, clustering, whether it should support copying movies from one box to another. The answers here should try to compromise for the happiness of the movie industry, I suppose. Should the concept of "renting" movies be implemented? Maybe.

Eventually, hopefully, the movie industry would have to buckle for the market, and would move to support it in order to maintain revenue, similar to what happened in regards to iPods/iTunes and Spotify. 

Of course, the concepts here are simplified, and the idea is rather utopian. But my point is that if we as engineers were able to build a concept that was so valuable and usable to all consumers that it would easily out-compete everything else on the market, the movie industry would eventually have to go along with it. And seeing how crappy the products out there are today, I think this is actually doable. 

Someone, please think this through properly, get it funded on Kickstarter and build me a BetaBox!

Popular posts from this blog

Encrypting and Decrypting with Spring

I was recently working with protecting some sensitive data in a typical Java application with a database underneath. We convert the data on its way out of the application using Spring Security Crypto Utilities. It "was decided" that we'd be doing AES with a key-length of 256, and this just happens to be the kind of encryption Spring crypto does out of the box. Sweet!

The big aber is that whatever JRE is running the application has to be patched with Oracle's JCE in order to do 256 bits. It's a fascinating story, the short version being that U.S. companies are restricted from exporting various encryption algorithms to certain countries, and some countries are restricted from importing them.

Once I had patched my JRE with the JCE, I found it fascinating how straight forward it was to encrypt and decrypt using the Spring Encryptors. So just for fun at the weekend, I threw together a little desktop app that will encrypt and decrypt stuff for the given password and sa…

Managing dot-files with vcsh and myrepos

Say I want to get my dot-files out on a new computer. Here's what I do:

# install vcsh & myrepos via apt/brew/etc
vcsh clone https://github.com/tfnico/config-mr.git mr
mr update

Done! All dot-files are ready to use and in place. No deploy command, no linking up symlinks to the files. No checking/out in my entire home directory as a Git repository. Yet, all my dot-files are neatly kept in fine-grained repositories, and any changes I make are immediately ready to be committed:

config-atom.git
    -> ~/.atom/*

config-mr.git
    -> ~/.mrconfig
    -> ~/.config/mr/*

config-tmuxinator.git  
    -> ~/.tmuxinator/*

config-vim.git
    -> ~/.vimrc
    -> ~/.vim/*

config-bin.git   
    -> ~/bin/*

config-git.git          
    -> ~/.gitconfig

config-tmux.git  
    -> ~/.tmux.conf    

config-zsh.git
    -> ~/.zshrc

How can this be? The key here is to use vcsh to keep track of your dot-files, and its partner myrepos/mr for operating on many repositories at the same time.

I discovere…

Always use git-svn with --prefix

TLDR: I've recently been forced back into using git-svn, and while I was at it, I noticed that git-svn generally behaves a lot better when it is initialized using the --prefix option.

Frankly, I can't see any reason why you would ever want to use git-svn without --prefix. It even added some major simplifications to my old git-svn mirror setup.

Update: Some of the advantages of this solution will disappear in newer versions of Git.

For example, make a standard-layout svn clone:

$ git svn clone -s https://svn.company.com/repos/project-foo/

You'll get this .git/config:

[svn-remote "svn"]
        url = https://svn.company.com/repos/
        fetch = project-foo/trunk:refs/remotes/trunk
        branches = project-foo/branches/*:refs/remotes/*
        tags = project-foo/tags/*:refs/remotes/tags/*

And the remote branches looks like this (git branch -a):
    remotes/trunk
    remotes/feat-bar

(Compared to regular remote branches, they look very odd because there is no remote name i…

Considerations for JavaScript in Modern (2013) Java/Maven Projects

Disclaimer: I'm a Java developer, not a JavaScript developer. This is just what I've picked up the last years plus a little research the last days. It's just a snapshot of my current knowledge and opinions on the day of writing, apt to change over the next weeks/months.

We've gone all modern in our web applications, doing MVC on the client side with AngularJS or Ember, building single-page webapps with REST backends. But how are we managing the growing amount of JavaScript in our application?
You ain't in Kansas anymore So far we've just been doing half-random stuff. We download some version of a library and throw it into our src/main/webapp/js/lib, or we use it from a CDN, which may be down or unreachable when we want to use the application..

Some times the JS is minified, other times it's not. Some times we name the file with version number, other times without. Some times we get the latest library of master branch and name it with the commit-id in the fi…

Microsoft ups their Git efforts another notch

This week Microsoft announced first class Git support embedded in the coming version of Visual Studio.

Now, it's not completely shocking. We could have seen it coming since Microsoft started offering Git repos on CodePlex, and more recently offering a Git client for TFS. In any case, these are some big news. Scott Hanselman weighs on some features and some more background here.

For those who are a bit unaware of what the Git situation on Windows looks like these days, I've dotted down these notes:
Some explanation on these:

msysGit has long been The Way to use Git on Windows. It's basically a port of Git itself, so it's a command-line tool.GitExtensions (includes Visual Studio integration), TortoiseGit, Git Shell, posh-git and most other tools are powered by msysGit.libgit2 is a native library for doing Git stuff. It is developed completely separate from Git itself. The above tools could (and should) probably use libgit2 instead of hooking onto and around msysGit.Github…